• Palm Beach’s police chief objected to Epstein’s “special treatment” and gave The Daily Beast an exclusive look at his nine-hour deposition about the investigation.

• Earlier versions of the U.S attorney’s charges, including a sealed 53-page indictment, could have landed Epstein in prison for 20 years.

• Victims alleged that Epstein molested underage girls from South America, Europe, and the former Soviet republics, including three 12-year-old girls brought over from France as a birthday gift.

• The victims also alleged trips out of state and abroad on Epstein’s private jets, which would be evidence of sex trafficking—a much more serious federal crime than the state charges Epstein was convicted of.

• Epstein’s attorneys investigated members of the Palm Beach Police Department, while others ordered private investigators to follow and intimidate the victims’ families; one even posed as a police officer.

• Then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales told The Daily Beast that he “would have instructed the Justice Department to pursue justice without making a political mess.”

Film director Roman Polanski is not the only convicted pedophile to walk free this month and return to a life of privilege. On Wednesday, hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein completes his one-year house arrest in Palm Beach, which has been even less arduous than Polanski’s time at a Swiss ski chalet.

During Epstein’s term of “house arrest,” he made several trips each month to his New York home and his private Caribbean island. In the earlier stage of his sentence for soliciting prostitution with a minor—13 months in the Palm Beach Stockade—he was allowed out to his office each day. Meanwhile, Epstein has settled more than a dozen lawsuits brought by the underage girls who were recruited to perform “massages” at his Palm Beach mansion. Seven victims reached a last-minute deal last week, days before a scheduled trial; each received well over $1 million—an amount that will hardly dent Epstein’s $2 billion net worth.

With that, the known victims of Epstein’s sexual compulsion have been officially silenced, and the case against him is closed unless new ones come forward. According to banking sources, he has been moving assets out of the U.S. and may well follow Polanski into a luxurious exile.

But the question remains: Did Epstein’s wealth and social connections—former President Bill Clinton; Prince Andrew; former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak; New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson; and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers were just a few of the prominent passengers on his private jets—allow him to receive only a slap on the wrist for crimes that carry a mandatory 20-year sentence? Was he able, with his limitless assets and heavy-hitting lawyers—Alan Dershowitz, Gerald Lefcourt, Roy Black, Kenneth Starr, Guy Lewis, and Martin Weinberger among them—to escape equal justice?

Michael Reiter, the former Palm Beach police chief, certainly thinks so. He gave The Daily Beast exclusive access to the transcript of his nine-hour deposition for the victims’ civil suits, in which he explained how the case against Epstein was minimized by the State Attorney’s Office, then bargained down by the U.S. Department of Justice, all in an atmosphere of hardball legal tactics and social pressures so intense that Reiter became estranged from several colleagues. At the time, Reiter, who retired in 2009 and now runs his own security firm, objected both to Epstein’s plea agreement and to the flexible terms of his incarceration in the county jail rather than state prison. Asked during the deposition whether he thought Epstein received special treatment, he answered “yes.”

In March 2005, Reiter’s department, acting on a complaint from the Florida parents of a 14-year-old girl, launched an investigation that would eventually uncover a pattern of predatory behavior stretching back years and spanning several continents, knowingly enabled by Epstein’s associates and employees. Two or three times a day, whenever Epstein was in Palm Beach, a teenage girl would be brought to the mansion on El Brillo Way. (“The younger the better,” he instructed Haley Robson, a local teenager who was paid to bring other girls to the house, and who declared, on a police tape, that she was “like a Heidi Fleiss,” the infamous California madam.) Advised that she would be giving a “massage,” the girl was then pressured to remove her clothes, submit to fondling and a large vibrator, and sometimes lured into more invasive sexual contact. Each girl was paid $200 or more, depending on how far things went, by house manager Alfredo Rodriguez, who was instructed always to have $2,000 cash on hand.

The Palm Beach Police Department identified 17 local girls who had contact with Epstein before the age of consent; the youngest was 14, and many were younger than 16. And that was just at one of Epstein’s many homes around the world—he also owns property in New York, Santa Fe, Paris, London, and the Caribbean. Subsequent investigation by the FBI, reaching as far back as 2001, indentified roughly 40 victims, not counting Nadia Marcinkova, whom Epstein referred to  as his “Yugoslavian sex slave” because he had imported her from the Balkans at age 14. Now 24, Marcinkova became a member of the household and is alleged to have participated in the sexual contact with underage girls.

Epstein quickly got wind of the investigation, and progress on the case got messy very quickly. He hired a squad of lawyers and private investigators and dispatched influential friends to pressure the police into backing off. Instead, local detectives pressed on and brought the matter to the attention of the FBI. The detectives asked their federal colleagues whether the fact that some victims appeared to have traveled out of state on Epstein’s planes—plus the use of interstate phone service to arrange assignations—might be violations of the federal 2000 Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which carries a minimum sentence of 20 years. (Florida enacted the federal TVPA in 2002.)

So when State Attorney Barry Krischer, who also ran Florida’s Crimes Against Children Unit, proved reluctant to mount a vigorous prosecution of Epstein, saying the local victims were not credible witnesses, Chief Reiter wrote the attorney a letter complaining of the state’s “highly unusual” conduct and asking him to remove himself from the case. He did not, and the evidence his office presented to a state grand jury produced only a single count of soliciting prostitution. (Krischer has since retired and would not comment for this article.) The day after that indictment was returned, Reiter was relieved to have the FBI step in and take over the investigation.

The details that eventually emerged were often shocking and occasionally bizarre. For Epstein’s birthday one year, according to allegations in a civil suit, he was presented with three 12-year-old girls from France, who were molested then flown back to Europe the next day. These same civil complaints allege that young girls from South America, Europe, and the former Soviet republics, few of whom spoke English, were recruited for Esptein’s sexual pleasure. According to a former bookkeeper, a number of the girls worked for MC2, the modeling agency owned by Jean Luc Brunel, a longtime acquaintance and frequent guest of Epstein’s. Brunel received $1 million from the billionaire around the time he started the agency.

The non-prosecution agreement executed between Epstein and the Department of Justice states that Epstein and four members of his staff were investigated for “knowingly, in affecting interstate and foreign commerce, recruiting enticing and obtaining by any means a person, knowing that person has not yet obtained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in commercial sex act”—that is, child sex trafficking. Yet the agreement allowed Epstein to plead guilty to only two lower-level state crimes, soliciting prostitution and soliciting a minor child for prostitution.

Although the police investigation was officially closed, Chief Reiter tried to stay abreast of the federal case against Epstein. He was particularly concerned that Epstein be registered as a sex offender, which was part of the final deal, and that a fund be set up to compensate his victims—which was not, although Epstein agreed to bankroll their civil lawsuits. Attorney Dershowitz says Epstein’s agreement to pay attorney fees for the victims and agree to civil damage claims—without admitting guilt—amounted to “extortion under threat of criminal prosecution.”

But exactly which crimes did the Department of Justice threaten to prosecute? The Daily Beast has learned that there were several earlier versions of the U.S Attorney’s charges, including a 53-page indictment that, had he been convicted, could have landed Epstein in prison for 20 years. Brad Edwards, attorney for seven of the victims, confirms the existence of an earlier draft of the non-prosecution agreement, officially under seal, in which it appears that Epstein “committed, at some point, to a 10-year federal sentence.” But in the end Epstein’s legal team refused that deal and threatened to proceed to trial. And that’s where the question of whether the case was “winnable” before a jury again came into play, according to a source in the U.S Attorney’s Office, which shared the state attorney’s view that the prosecution was far from a slam dunk.

For one, it was clear from the start that Epstein would spare no legal expense and that his team of veteran lawyers, whose cases ranged from O.J. Simpson to the investigation of Clinton’s relationship with an intern, would play rough. When the Palm Beach police started to identify victims, according to Detective Joe Recarey’s report, Dershowitz began sending the detective Facebook and MySpace posts to demonstrate that some of these girls were no angels. Reiter’s deposition also states that he heard from local private investigators that Dershowitz had launched background checks on both the police chief and Det. Recarey. Dershowitz denies all of that. According to Reiter, both he and Recarey also became aware that they were under surveillance for several months, without knowing who ordered it. And the Florida victims began to complain that they and family members were being followed and intimidated by private investigators who were then linked to local attorneys in Epstein’s employ. In one reported instance, the private investigator claimed to be a police officer, and Reiter considered filing witness-tampering charges.

The credibility of the victims was also an issue; they had never complained of their treatment by Epstein until they were contacted by police, and they may have voluntarily returned to the Palm Beach mansion several times. Many of the girls came from disadvantaged backgrounds or broken homes, and they were susceptible to Epstein’s cash, intimidation, and charm. Those who were 16 when they went to El Brillo Way would have been in their 20s by the time they took the stand, and Epstein’s investigators had dredged up every instance of bad behavior in their pasts. According to an exchange in the Reiter deposition, a few of the victims had worked in West Palm Beach at massage parlors known as “jack shacks.” Each new compromising detail was immediately forwarded to the State Attorney’s Office, where staff met frequently with Epstein’s lawyers.

The Florida statutes are clear: Any person older than 24 who engages in sexual contact with someone under the age of 18 commits a felony of the second degree. The victim’s prior sexual conduct is not relevant; ignorance of her age is no defense. She needn’t resist physically to cast doubt on the issue of “consent.” For a child under 16, even lewd behavior short of touching is a felony of the second degree. But convincing a jury that a sexual encounter is a heinous crime is difficult if the victim can be made to appear willing and unharmed, not to mention vulgar and mercenary. It wasn’t hard to imagine some of the victims quickly being discredited in court by Epstein’s crack legal team, who repeatedly noted that the age of consent is lower in many other states.

But that doesn’t quite explain why the Department of Justice would forgo the child-trafficking charges, which pertain regardless of a girl’s attitude or character. Epstein’s final sentence is so out of line with the statutory guidelines for that crime that it appears the department may have been influenced by the existence of his many powerful friends and attorneys. A highly intelligent man who once taught math at the Dalton School in New York without a bachelor’s degree, Epstein has been a serious and respected player in the highest reaches of politics and philanthropy. He has made substantial contributions to political candidates, served on the Council on Foreign Relations, and donated $30 million to Harvard University.

Moreover, many of his high-powered acquaintances availed themselves of Epstein’s private jets, for which the pilot logs, obtained by discovery in the civil suits, sometimes showed that bold-face names were on the same flights as underage girls. A high-profile trial threatened to splash mud over all sorts of big players, just as both Gov. Richardson and Bill Clinton’s wife were running for president. Also, a hedge fund prosecution in which Epstein offered to give evidence was heating up. Alberto Gonzales, who was U.S. attorney general throughout most of the Epstein investigation and resigned just before the non-prosecution agreement was signed, told The Daily Beast that he “would have instructed the Justice Department to pursue justice without making a political mess.” But that may have been an impossible mandate, given the players involved.

Instead, said attorney Brad Edwards, “Epstein committed crimes that should have jailed him for most of his life…he was jailed for only a few months.” And this week he walks through his door a free man.

Conchita Sarnoff

By TALES AZZONI,

Associated Press.

SAO PAULO (AP) – Police detained an 83-year-old Brazilian priest after a congressional hearing produced allegations he molested boys as young as 12 and a television station displayed a sex tape of him in bed with a 19-year-old. 

The pedophilia allegations against Msgr. Luiz Marques Barbosa are the most lurid of several sexual scandals to hit the Brazilian church recently, largely because of the videotape that has been widely distributed over the Internet.

Sen. Magno Malta, the lawmaker leading the legislature’s sexual abuse probe, said that the detention late Sunday of Barbosa was a milestone in the fight against child abuse in Brazil. He said the investigation is not an attack on the church, but at suspected child molesters.

Judge Romulo Vasconcelos, who participated in the congressional probe, told Globo TV on Monday that he requested Barbosa’s immediate detention out of fear that the priest would flee the country.

The case now goes to prosecutors, who will decide whether to file child abuse charges.

Congressional investigators said that more than 20 witnesses were called and some testified that Barbosa and two other priests in the same northeastern archdiocese had abused boys as young as 12, giving them money, clothes and other gifts.

Bishop Valerio Breda of the Penedo archdiocese in the northeastern state of Alagoas said recently that all three priests had been suspended and that the church was conducting its own investigation.

Breda said none of the alleged victims or their families had ever contacted the church with allegations of abuse, but it was cooperating with police.

One of the accused priests, Edison Duarte, was given immunity for cooperating with authorities, Sen. Malta said in a statement. The third priest – Raimundo Marques – also was being investigated but denied any wrongdoing. He has not been arrested.

Church members have not responded to calls requesting information on where Barbosa and the other priests had worked in the past. While he holds the rank of monsignor, he apparently has never been a bishop. It was not immediately clear if Barbosa had a lawyer.

Barbosa told investigators that “he is not a pedophile,” but after three former altar boys testified he had abused them, he asked for forgiveness, according to Renato Paoliello, a spokesman for Malta.

Barbosa also told investigators he is not homosexual and said what happened in the video was a one-time incident, Paoliello said.

The video – secretly filmed in January 2009 – was broadcast by the SBT network last month. It was not clear if the 19-year-old, identified as a former altar boy who had worked with Barbosa for four years, had previous sexual relations with the priest.

SBT said the video was sent anonymously to the network, and reporters went to the town of 200,000 people to investigate.

Confronted by the network, Barbosa said that pedophilia “is more (a problem) of homosexuality than pedophilia.” Asked if he ever abused boys, Barbosa said he could only answer such a question “in confession” and cut off the interview.

Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP news report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press. Active hyperlinks have been inserted by AOL.

Pope Benedict XVI announced his readiness to receive more victims of sexual abuses committed by priests, according to a communique issued by the Vatican on Friday.

  In remarks to Vatican Radio, spokesman for the Holy Seed Reverend Federico Lombardi said the text addresses the approach to be followed by the Catholic Church against continuous cases of pedophilia committed by members of religious orders in several countries of Europe, Latin America and the United States, made public after several decades of silence.

Lombardi said the Church must “continue acting with determination and veracity against those responsible by applying properly the proceedings of the canon law, besides collaborating with civil authorities with regard to their judicial and criminal competences.”

ef rma npg

The so-called policy of silence, followed for decades by the Vatican, was obeyed even by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, now Benedict XVI, according to German press reports accusing him of having hosted in 1980 in the diocese of Munich to a priest history of child sexual abuse to undergo therapy.

The priest was later transferred to a parish without Ratzinger, the largest local authority, be informed and returned to transgress.

The case illustrates the attitude of the Catholic hierarchy until it erupted in 2000 many serious pedophilia scandals in the U.S.. js

With information from: univison.com

by Paul L. Williams, Ph.D. of The Last Crusade
A Chronicle Watch Contributor

The number of Muslim “import brides” – – almost all of whom are poorly educated school-age children – – is increasing at such a rate in the Netherlands that it is causing “the destabilization of society.”

So says Eberhard van der Laan, the Dutch government’s Minister of Housing, Communities, and Integration.

“We can’t cope with it anymore,” Mr. van der Laan says.

The Dutch minister maintains that the problem has given rise to “crime, fraud, domestic violence, polygamy, and slavery.” Almost all of the import brides are under 18 – – some are children who have not entered puberty.

How many mature Muslim men in the Netherlands have child brides? Mr. van der Laan places the number at 15,000.

In a belated effort to solve the problem, the Dutch government has enacted legislation prohibiting marriage to children who are not yet 18 years-old.

To skirt this problem, Muslim men – – many in their 50s and 60s – – are traveling to Morocco, Turkey, and other Islamic countries for a wedding ceremony and returning to the Netherlands with their child brides.

The Dutch government has adopted additional measures to curb the problem of pedophilia, such as the forbidding of marriages between cousins and uncles and nieces – – practices that are common throughout the Islamic world – – all to no avail.

The majority of the child brides, according to Mr. van der Laan, come from Turkey, Morocco, and Somalia. He maintains that they are forced by their parents to marry older relatives who have taken up residence in the Netherlands.

Eberhard van der Laan is a member of leftist Dutch Labor Party (PvdA). This party has been largely responsible for failed immigration policies of the last three years. The previous center-right coalition government of Christian-Democrats (CDA) and the conservative liberal Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), which ruled between 2003 and 2007, took a tough stance on immigration and successfully curbed blatant abuses. The number of Muslim import brides went down, so did the number of Islamic asylum-seekers.

The CDA and VVD instituted measures that produced immediate results. One measure prohibited Islamists from importing of brides who were under the age of 21.

These rules were relaxed after the new center-leftist coalition government of Christian-Democrats and the Dutch Labor Party was formed in February 2007

Deputy Justice Minister Nebahat Albayrak (a second-generation Turkish immigrant and a member of the Labor Party) immediately pardoned some 27,000 asylum-seekers who moved to the Netherlands before 2001 but whose applications had been rejected repeatedly by Dutch courts.

As a result of the relaxation of immigration rules, the number of new asylum applications increased dramatically and is now even stretching the Dutch budget to the breaking point. The government no longer can pay the basic state pension for people aged 65 and over.

The Dutch government’s reluctance to call a halt to the Muslim immigration has raised concerns that the Netherlands may become an Islamic nation by 2024.

Dutch activist and documentary filmmaker Geert Welders, appearing at the Anti-Jihad Convention in Jerusalem, said: “Thousands and thousands of Muslims arrive in the Netherlands every year, while already one million Muslims are living in our tiny country. There are many problems concerning this massive influx: immigrants are overly represented in social benefits and crime statistics and the overall costs are staggering.

“But what we have to fear most is the creeping Islamization, the stealth jihad. Because every Islamic neighborhood, every Islamic shop, every mosque, every Islamic school, every burqa, every veil is regarded by many Muslims as building blocks towards a larger goal, towards domination.”

Narrated ‘Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that ‘Aisha remained with the Prophet for nine years (i.e. till his death).” what you know of the Quran (by heart)’ Bukhari 7. 62. 65

A Somali man “married” a girl 95 years his junior. (H/T: Susan P. at Muslims Against Sharia.)

He said his children and two other wives agreed to the marriage, as did Safiya’s parents. And he claimed he wants to have more children with his young bride.

An 80-year-old Saudi “married” a 10 year-old.  (H/T: Atlas.)

He explained that the girl’s father had first offered him his older daughter, but when the latter refused, the father had suggested the younger one, and he had agreed, since when girl was shown to him, he couldn’t see anything to prevent their getting married.

I’m sure that’s all unrelated to the fact that Islamic nations again come in last in the World Economic Forum (way more fair than the UN or even USCIRF) Global Gender Gap Index

This included such major nations as Pakistan (ranked 132 out of 134), Saudi Arabia (ranked 130 out of 134), Iran (ranked 128 out of 134), Egypt (ranked 126 out of 134), and Turkey (ranked 129 out 134).  Yemen, which is 99 percent Islamic, was the bottom ranked nation as 134 on the Global Gender Gap Index.  The only nation not predominantly Islamic in the bottom of the Global Gender Gap index was Benin.

In addition, the 2009 World Economic Forum Global Gender Gap Index report does not include rankings on a number of significant and predominantly Islamic nations where women are oppressed [Somalia, Sudan, Iraq, Afghanistan].

No Comments · Chipping Away at Islam, Culture of Death, Hatred/Abuse of Children, Islamic Evil, Islamic Perversion, Mohammedan Parallel Universe, Persecution of Women, Persecution of the Individual, Sick Arab Culture, Terrorism, Uncategorized